Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Sun News

Those of you who know me will know that I have many reasons to abhor the new Sun News Network. Here's a sampling, for example:
  • lack of journalistic integrity
  • lack of quality news reporting and international coverage
  • extreme right-wing bias
  • extreme hypocrisy
  • whiney, wannabe commentators
  • lack of critical analysis
  • ugly set and gross graphics
But the thing about Sun News that I noticed almost immediately upon watching it (and yes - I watch it. Sometimes on commercials. It's like a bad car accident that you can't tear yourself away from) is that they are totally self-conscious about their place in the Canadian media landscape. They couldn't just show up and do a good job and try to convince people to watch them the old-fashioned way, i.e. by employing the use of quality journalistic techniques.

So, like the schoolyard bully who really lacks confidence underneath all of that bravado, Sun News attacks other media outlets. In particular, and pretty consistently for their first few days on the air, Sun News seems pretty freaking scared of the CBC. Indeed, it is like the news station equivalent of penis envy with Sun News dying to show you how big theirs really is. And better too! So there!

It's sad enough when news outlets resort to extreme bias, fear mongering and shoddy news reporting. But at least if that's what you're going to do, stand up, put your big-boy pants on and have the guts to call it what it is.

Sexism Runs Rampant on Celebrity Apprentice

Donald Trump was always a bit of a dink. Now, he appears to be an ultra right-wing Republican dink.

On the most recent episode of Celebrity Apprentice, Trump could not fathom why a professional woman would not want to be called "sweetie" by a colleague during a professional exchange. Not only could he not fathom it, he ended up firing Star Jones for politely objecting to being diminished as a woman.

To recap: Outside the boardroom, while waiting for Trump's decision, Meatloaf decided to engage Star Jones in an argument. He began by condescendingly calling her "sweetie." Jones, politely asked not to be referred to in that way. Meatloaf, who throughout the season has shown himself to have severe mood management issues, flew off the handle and began raging at Jones. When she declined to engage in his antics, he grew even more irate. Back in the boardroom, Trump wondered what all the fuss was about. Jones pointed out that it began when Meatloaf called her "sweetie." Mind you, she was not even complaining about this, but simply pointing out how the incident began. Before the conversation could turn to Meatloaf's completely inappropriate behaviour, Trump got stuck on the "political correctness" of calling a professional woman "sweetie" (or any such term).

"I don't understand it? What's wrong with it? Aren't you just being too sensitive?" Trump asked all these questions leaving Jones to defend herself. Jones pointed out that had she been called "sweetie" by a friend at lunch she wouldn't have minded. What she objected to was being called such a term while in the context of a professional conversation with a colleague. She pointed out that the term was used to diminish her as a professional woman when she should have been treated as an equal. That was all. A clear, succinct explanation. But Trump wouldn't have any of it. He fired Jones.

So. Not only was there a sexist comment made in the first place, Trump validated it by firing the woman who was the target of the comment. A woman who has proved herself to be one of the strongest players this season. In favour of a man who is clearly erratic. A deeper analysis of this incident might also point to the fact that Jones is a black woman, and both the person who made the comment and the three people who sat as judges, were white men.

So. What is the big deal? Isn't this just an episode of crappy reality television anyway. Well, crappy as reality television may be, a lot of people watch. And perhaps more than fictionalized media forms, audiences tend to engage more with reality television and thus internalize more of the value messages.

Calling a woman "sweetie" or any other such term in a professional context diminishes her position as an equal colleague. It diminishes her as a person. Whether consciously intended or not, when a man makes such a comment to his colleague he is doing it to demean her. It is intended to take her down a notch. It is no accident that Meatloaf began his argument with Jones with this comment. He wanted to set the tone. And he flew into a blind rage when Jones had the audacity to speak up for herself.

Ask yourself: is there a similar comment that a woman could make to a male colleague that would have the same impact? I would argue that there isn't. Not a comment that reduce him and objectify him based solely on his gender. That, my friends, is sexism.

Sunday, January 22, 2006

What exactly is it that I like about shows like Dateline, CBC Marketplace, etc. I remember being at Girl Guide camp when I was somewhere between the ages of 10 and 12 and thinking (no actually saying out loud to someone else) "Oh man I am missing 20/20 tonight"

There was just a segment on Dateline about critical food violations in supermarkets. In particular, these are my favourite types of stories (in fact I hate the adventurey I survived this or that type of story). I LOVE consumer reports. In fact, once again dorky child that I was, I wanted a subscription to Consumer Reports magazine when I was a preteen.

Of course, the whole Dateline story is moot because I live in Canada and we don't have any if the same supermarkets here. But I stopped watching Criminal Intent. I at least wanted to know what kinds of critical food violations can occur in supermarkets.

It is interesting how we (or people like me) will turn to these shows to "tell us the truth" about certain products. I'm sure a favourite of most is the car insurance crash tests. BANG! Don't buy that one, buy this one.

Are all these consumer reports actually striking fear? Well, sure...the reporter uses that alarmist tone. But at once they soothe. Especially if the place you most like "wins." But it is also soothing to know that the TV people are looking out for us consumers. They don't want us to stop consuming. They just want us to be healthy while we do it.

m.


Saturday, January 21, 2006

It's lonely here so far.


I'm not a blogger. Yet. I had this idea last night in a bar.


I wasn't drinking. So I guess it's somewhat serious for now. Because the guy who writes the television column for my free local daily sucks.


And I am both silly and serious about television (and yes I have an exhausting full-time job as well).


So I guess you could call this my first foray into the blogger world. Like I somehow gave in and decided to go see Brokeback Mountain.


m.